Original Article
Predictors of non-compliant classroom behaviour of secondary school students. Identifying the influence of sex, learning problems, behaviour problems, social behaviour, peer relations and student–teacher relations
Susanne Schwab,
Boris Eckstein,
Kurt Reusser,
Corresponding Author
Susanne Schwab
University of Wuppertal, Germany
Universtiy of Vienna, Austria
North-West University, South-Africa
Address for correspondence
Susanne Schwab,
Universtiy of Vienna,
Austria.
Email: [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorBoris Eckstein
University of Teacher Education St. Gallen, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorSusanne Schwab,
Boris Eckstein,
Kurt Reusser,
Corresponding Author
Susanne Schwab
University of Wuppertal, Germany
Universtiy of Vienna, Austria
North-West University, South-Africa
Address for correspondence
Susanne Schwab,
Universtiy of Vienna,
Austria.
Email: [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorBoris Eckstein
University of Teacher Education St. Gallen, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Students’ non-compliant classroom behaviour is mentioned as one of the biggest challenges for teaching. This study examines the non-compliant behaviour of secondary school students and its predictors. Data were obtained from a longitudinal sample of 639 secondary school students in Austria (Styria). Students filled out a paper-pencil questionnaire at the end of the 7th grade (mean age = 13.5 years, SD = 0.61) and 8th grade. Non-compliant classroom behaviour was assessed using a 15 item self-rating scale. First results indicate that boys show more non-compliant classroom behaviour than girls. Students with hyperactivity stated to show more non-compliant classroom behaviour than students without hyperactivity. However, students with and without emotional problems as well as students with and without learning problems did not differ in their self-rated non-compliant classroom behaviour. Findings of multi-level analyses showed that more positive student–teacher relation is linked with less non-compliant classroom behaviour for both girls and boys. As non-compliant classroom behaviour is a relatively stable characteristic of both male and female students, it is important to intervene as early as possible. In addition, schools should take classroom compositions into account and make teachers aware of the high importance of the student–teacher relation for students’ behaviour.
References
- Arbuckle, C. & Little, E. (2004) ‘Teachers’ perceptions and management of disruptive classroom behaviour during the middle years.’ Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 4, pp. 59–70.
- Baker, J. A., Grant, S. & Morlock, L. (2008) ‘The teacher-student relationship as a developmental context for children with internalizing or externalizing behavior problems.’ School Psychology Quarterly, 23 (1), pp. 3–15.
- Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E. & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007) ‘Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high.’ Journal of Educational Psychology, 99 (2), pp. 274–84.
- Bartolo, P. A. (2010) ‘The process of teacher education for inclusion: the Maltese experience.’ Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 10, pp. 139–48.
10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01163.x Google Scholar
- Beaman, R., Wheldall, K. & Kemp, C. (2007) ‘Recent research on troublesome classroom behaviour.’ Australasian Journal of Special Education, 31 (1), pp. 45–60.
10.1017/S1030011200025586 Google Scholar
- Breslau, J., Miller, E., Breslau, N., Bohnert, K., Lucia, V. & Schweitzer, J. (2009) ‘The impact of early behavior disturbances on academic achievement in high school.’ Pediatrics, 123 (6), pp. 1472–6.
- De Boer, A., Pijl, S. J. & Minnaert, A. (2011) ‘Regular primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: a review of the literature.’ International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15 (3), pp. 331–53.
- De Monchy, M., Pijl, S. J. & Zandberg, T. (2004) ‘Discrepancies in judging social inclusion and bullying of pupils with behaviour problems.’ European Journal of Special Needs Education, 19, pp. 317–30.
10.1080/0885625042000262488 Google Scholar
- Ding, A., Li, Y., Li, X. & Kulm, G. (2008) ‘Chinese teachers’ perceptions of students’ classroom misbehavior.’ Educational Psychology, 28, pp. 305–24.
- Eckstein, B. (2018) ‘ Unterrichtsstörungen. Eine Frage der Perspektive?’ In S. Schwab, G. Tafner, S. Luttenberger, H. Knauder & M. Reisinger (eds), Von der Wissenschaft in die Praxis? Zum Verhältnis von Forschung und Praxis in der Bildungsforschung, pp. 78–92. Münster: Waxmann.
- Eckstein, B., Grob, U. & Reusser, K. (2016) ‘Unterrichtliche Devianz und subjektives Störungsempfinden. Entwicklung eines Instrumentariums zur Erfassung von Unterrichtsstörungen.’ Empirische Pädagogik, 30 (1), pp. 113–29.
- Ellis, W. E. & Zarbartany, L. (2007) ‘Peer group status as a moderator of group influence on children's deviant, aggressive, and prosocial behavior.’ Child Development, 78, pp. 1240–54.
- Engels, M. C., Colpin, H., Bijttebier, P., Van Den Noortgate, W., Claes, S., Goossens, L. & Verschueren, K. (2016) ‘Behavioral engagement, peer status, and teacher–student relationships in adolescence: a longitudinal study on reciprocal influences.’ Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45 (6), pp. 1192–207.
- Ettekal, I. & Ladd, G. W. (2015) ‘Developmental pathways from childhood aggression-disruptiveness, chronic peer rejection, and deviant friendships to early-adolescent rule breaking.’ Child Development, 86, pp. 614–31.
- Ewing, A. R. & Taylor, A. R. (2009) ‘The role of child gender and ethnicity in teacher–child relationship quality and children's behavioral adjustment in preschool.’ Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24, pp. 92–105.
- Goodman, A. & Goodman, R. (2011) ‘Population mean scores predict child mental disorder rates: validating SDQ prevalence estimators in Britain.’ Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52 (1), pp. 100–8.
- Grosche, M. (2015) ‘ Was ist Inklusion? Ein Diskussions- und Positionsartikel zur Definition von Inklusion aus Sicht der empirischen Bildungsforschung.’ In P. Kuhl, P. Stanat, B. Lütje-Klose, C. Gresch, H. A. Pant & M. Prenzel (eds), Inklusion von Schülerinnen und Schülern mit sonderpädagogischem Förderbedarf in Schuleistungserhebungen, pp. 17–39. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
- Hox, J. J. & Maas, C. G. M. (2006) ‘ Multilevel models for multimethod measures.’ In M. Eid & E. Diener (eds), Multimethod Measurement in Psychology, pp. 269–82. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.1037/11383-019 Google Scholar
- Hughes, J. N. (2012) ‘ Teachers as managers of students’ peer context.’ In A. Ryan & G. L. Ladd (eds), Peer relationships and adjustment at school, pp. 189–218. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
- Klasen, H., Woerner, W., Wolke, D., Meyer, R., Overmeyer, S., Kaschnitz, W. & Goodman, R. (2000) ‘Comparing the German versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu) and the child behavior checklist.’ European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, pp. 271–6.
- Krammer, M., Gebhardt, M., Rossmann, P., Paleczek, L. & Gasteiger-Klicpera, B. (2014) ‘On the diagnosis of learning disabilities in the Austrian school system: official directions and the diagnostic process in practice in Styria/Austria.’ European Journal of Disability Research, 8, pp. 30–9.
10.1016/j.alter.2013.11.001 Google Scholar
- Kyriacou, C. (1997) Effective Teaching in Schools. ( 2nd edn). Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
- Lansford, J. E., Skinner, A. T., Sorbring, E., Di Giunta, L., Deater-Deckard, K., Dodge, K. A. & Chang, L. (2012) ‘Boys’ and girls’ relational and physical aggression in nine countries.’ Aggressive Behavior, 38 (4), pp. 298–308.
- Lienert, G. A. & Raatz, U. (1994) Testaufbau und Testanalyse. ( 5th edn). Weinheim: PVU.
- Little, E. (2005) ‘Secondary school teachers’ perceptions of students’ problem behaviours.’ Educational Psychology, 25, pp. 369–77.
10.1080/01443410500041516 Google Scholar
- Makarova, E., Herzog, W. & Schönbächler, M.-T. (2014) ‘Wahrnehmung und Interpretation von Unterrichtsstörungen aus Schülerperspektive sowie aus Sicht der Lehrpersonen [Perception and interpretation of classroom disturbances in the perspectives of students and teachers].’ Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 61 (2), pp. 127–40.
- Maldonado-Carreño, C. & Votruba-Drzal, E. (2011) ‘Teacher–child relationships and the development of academic and behavioral skills during elementary school: a within- and between-child analysis.’ Child Development, 82, pp. 601–16.
- Mand, J. (2007) ‘Social position of special needs pupils in the classroom: a comparison between German special schools for pupils with learning difficulties and integrated primary school classes.’ European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22, pp. 7–14.
10.1080/08856250601082182 Google Scholar
- Martinez, A., McMahon, S. D. & Treger, S. (2015) ‘Individual- and school-level predictors of student office disciplinary referrals.’ Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 24 (1), pp. 30–41.
- McLaughlin, C., Byers, R. & Vaughn, R. P. (2010) Responding to Bullying among Children with Special Educational Needs and/or Disabilities. London, UK: Anti-Bullying Alliance.
- Mejia, T. M. & Hoglund, W. L. G. (2016) ‘Do children's adjustment problems contribute to teacher–child relationship quality? Support for a child-driven model.’ Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 34, pp. 13–26.
- Mieloo, C., Raat, H., van Oort, F., Bevaart, F., Vogel, I., Donker, M. & Jansen, W. (2012) ‘Validity and reliability of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in 5–6 year olds: differences by gender or by parental education?’ PLoS ONE, 7 (5), pp. e36805. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036805.
- Müller, C. M., Begert, T., Hofmann, V. & Studer, F. (2013) ‘Effekte der Klassenzusammensetzung auf individuelles schulisches Problemverhalten – Welche Rolle spielt das Verhalten der Gesamtklasse, der “Coolen”, der „Extremen” und der persönlichen Freunde?’ Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 59, pp. 722–42.
- Munn, P., Sharp, S., Lloyd, G., Macleod, G., McCluskey, G., Brown, J. & Hamilton, L. (2013) ‘A comparison of staff perceptions of behaviour in Scottish schools in 2009 and 2006.’ Research Papers in Education, 28, pp. 135–54.
- O'Connor, E. E., Dearing, E. & Collins, B. A. (2011) ‘Teacher-child relationship and behavior problem trajectories in elementary school.’ American Educational Research Journal, 48, pp. 120–62.
- Oldfield, J., Humphrey, N. & Hebron, J. (2015) ‘Cumulative risk effects for the development of behaviour difficulties in children and adolescents with special educational needs and disabilities.’ Research in Developmental Disabilities, 41, pp. 66–75.
- Pianta, R. C. (1999) Enhancing Relationships between Children and Teachers. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.1037/10314-000 Google Scholar
- Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K. & Allen, J. P. (2012) ‘ Teacher-student relationships and engagement: conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions.’ In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (eds), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, pp. 365–86. New York, NY: Springer.
- Rauer, W. & Schuck, K. D. (2003) FEESS 3–4. Fragebogen zur Erfassung emotionaler und sozialer Schulerfahrungen von Grundschulkindern dritter und vierter Klassen. Göttingen: Beltz.
- Robinson, S. L. & Griesemer, S. M. R. (2006) ‘ Helping individual students with problem behavior.’ In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (eds), Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues, pp. 787–802. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Roorda, D. L., Verschueren, K., Vancraeyveldt, C., Van Craeyevelt, S. & Colpin, H. (2014) ‘Teacher–child relationships and behavioral adjustment: transactional links for preschool boys at risk.’ Journal of School Psychology, 52, pp. 495–510.
- Rose, C. A., Espelage, D. L., Aragon, S. R. & Elliott, J. (2011) ‘Bullying and victimization among students in special education and general education curricula.’ Exceptionality Education International, 21 (2), pp. 2–14.
- Rose, C. A., Espelage, D. L., Monda-Amaya, L. E., Shogren, K. A. & Aragon, S. R. (2013) ‘Bullying and middle school students with and without specific learning disabilities: an examination of social-ecological predictors.’ Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48 (3), pp. 239–54.
- Rose, C. A., Monda-Amaya, L. E. & Espelage, D. L. (2011) ‘Bullying perpetration and victimization in special education: a review of the literature.’ Remedial and Special Education, 32, pp. 114–30.
- Rost, D. H. (2005) Interpretation und Bewertung pädagogischpsychologischer Studien. Weinheim: Beltz.
- Russell, G., Rodgers, L. R. & Ford, T. (2013) ‘The strengths and difficulties questionnaire as a predictor of parent-reported diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.’ PLoS ONE, 8 (12), pp. e80247. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080247.
- Schwab, S. (2014) Schulische Integration, soziale Partizipation und emotionales Wohlbefinden in der Schule. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Längsschnittstudie. Wien: Lit. Verlag.
- Schwab, S. (2015) ‘Einstellung zur Integration im Zusammenhang mit sozialer Inklusion – Eine Fragebogenerhebung in österreichischen Integrations- und Regelschulklassen.’ Vierteljahresschrift für Heilpädagogik und ihre Nachbargebiete, 84, pp. 66–7.
10.2378/vhn2015.art08d Google Scholar
- Schwab, S. (2018) ‘ Attitudes towards inclusive schooling. A study on Students’, Teachers’ and Parents’ attitudes.’ In Band IV in der Reihe „Beiträge der Bildungsforschung” der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Forschung und Entwicklung im Bildungswesen (ÖFEB). Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
- Schwab, S., Gebhardt, M., Hessels, M. G. P. & Nusser, L. (2016) ‘Predicting a high rate of self-assessed and parent-assessed peer problems – Is it typical for students with disabilities?’ Research in Developmental Disabilities, 49–50, pp. 196–204.
- Schwab, S., Hessels, M. G. P., Obendrauf, T., Polanig, M. C. & Wölflingseder, L. (2015) ‘Assessing special educational needs in Austria: Description of labeling practices and their evolution from 1996 to 2013.’ Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 14 (3), pp. 329–42.
- Silva, M. A. I., Pereira, B., Mendonça, D., Nunes, B. & de Oliveira, W. A. (2013) ‘The involvement of girls and boys with bullying: an analysis of gender differences.’ International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10 (12), pp. 6820–31.
- Skalická, V., Stenseng, F., Belsky, J. & Wichstrøm, L. (2015) ‘Reciprocal relations between student-teacher relationship and children's behavioral problems: moderation by child-care group size.’ Child Development, 86, pp. 1557–70.
- Skalická, V., Stenseng, F. & Wichstrøm, L. (2015) ‘Reciprocal relations between student–teacher conflict, children's social skills and externalizing behavior: a three-wave longitudinal study from preschool to third grade.’ International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39, pp. 413–25.
- Spilt, J. L., van Lier, P. A. C., Leflot, G., Onghena, P. & Colpin, H. (2014) ‘Children's social self-concept and internalizing problems: the influence of peers and teachers.’ Child Development, 85, pp. 1248–56.
- Van Cleave, J. & Davis, M. M. (2006) ‘Bullying and peer victimization among children with special health care needs.’ Pediatrics, 118, pp. 1212–9.
- Van Lier, P. A. C., Vitaro, F., Wanner, B., Vuijk, P. & Crijnen, A. A. M. (2005) ‘’Gender differences in developmental links among antisocial behavior, friends’ antisocial behavior, and peer rejection in childhood: results from two cultures’.’ Child Development, 76, pp. 841–55.
- Wei, H.-S., Chang, H.-H. & Chen, J. K. (2015) ‘Bullying and victimisation among Taiwanese students in special schools.’ International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 63, pp. 246–59.
- Wheeler, J. & Carlson, C. L. (1994) ‘The social functioning of children with ADD with hyperactivity and ADD without hyperactivity: a comparison of their peer relations and social deficits.’ Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 2, pp. 2–12.
- Woerner, W., Becker, A., Friedrich, C., Klasen, H., Goodman, R. & Rothenberger, A. (2002) ‘Normierung und Evaluation der deutschen Elternversion des Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Felderhebung. [Normative data and evaluation of the German parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): results of a representative field study].’ Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 30, pp. 105–12.
