Time to end the bias towards inclusive education?
Corresponding Author
Katherine Runswick-Cole
Katherine Runswick-Cole, Research Fellow in Disability Studies and Psychology, Research Institute of Health and Social Change, Manchester Metropolitan University, Elizabeth Gaskell Campus, Hathersage Road, Manchester M13 0JA, Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Katherine Runswick-Cole
Katherine Runswick-Cole, Research Fellow in Disability Studies and Psychology, Research Institute of Health and Social Change, Manchester Metropolitan University, Elizabeth Gaskell Campus, Hathersage Road, Manchester M13 0JA, Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The UK coalition Government's call to end the ‘bias’ towards inclusion represents a shift in ‘policy speak’ as the new administration attempts to re-narrate special education by putting forward a ‘reasonable and sensible’ solution to the ‘problem of inclusion’. However, implicit in the call is the assumption that there has, in fact, been a ‘bias towards inclusion’ in education policy and practice; here, that assumption is challenged. Using a critical disability studies perspective, Katherine Runswick-Cole, who is a research fellow in Disability Studies and Psychology in the Research Institute of Health and Social Change at Manchester Metropolitan University, draws on the concept of ableism and critiques of neo-liberal market systems in education to reveal and explore the persistent barriers to inclusive education embedded within the education system. It is argued that although there may have been an inclusive education policy rhetoric, this rhetoric is rooted in conceptual incongruities which, rather than promoting inclusion, undermine an inclusive approach to education.
References
-
Ainscow, M.,
Booth, T. &
Dyson, A. (2006) ‘Inclusion and the standards agenda: negotiating policy pressures in England’, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 10 (4), 295–308.
10.1080/13603110500430633 Google Scholar
-
Allan, J. (2006) ‘The repetition of exclusion’, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 10 (2), 121–133.
10.1080/13603110500221511 Google Scholar
- Apple, M. (2001) ‘Comparing neo-liberal projects and equality in education’, Comparative Education, 37 (4), 409–423.
- Armstrong, D. (2005) ‘Reinventing inclusion: New Labour and the cultural politics of special education’, Oxford Review of Education, 31 (1), 135–151.
- Baker, B. (2002) ‘The hunt for disability: the new eugenics and the normalization of schoolchildren’, Teachers College Record, 104 (4), 663–703.
- Ball, S. J. (2009) The Education Debate. Bristol: Policy Press.
-
Barton, L. (1997) ‘Inclusive education: romantic, subversive or realistic?’
International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1 (3), 231–242.
10.1080/1360311970010301 Google Scholar
- Burman, E. (2008) Deconstructing Developmental Psychology. London: Routledge.
- Cabinet Office (2010) The Coalition: our programme for government. London: Cabinet Office [online at http://programmeforgovernment.hmg.gov.uk/schools/].
- Campbell, F. K. (2001) ‘Inciting legal fictions: disability's date with ontology and the ableist body of the law’, Griffith Law Review, 10, 42–62.
- Campbell, F. K. (2008) ‘Refusing able(ness): a preliminary conversation about ableism’, M/C Journal, 11 (3), 1–15.
- Campbell, F. K. (2009) Contours of Ableism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Croll, P. & Moses, D. (2004) Special Needs in the Primary School: one in five? London: Cassell.
- CSIE (Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education) (2011) ‘What is inclusion?’ [online at http://www.csie.org.uk/inclusion/what.shtml].
- Culham, A. and Nind, M. (2003) ‘Deconstructing normalisation: clearing the way for inclusion’, Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 28 (1), 65–78.
- DES (Department of Education and Science) (1978) Special Educational Needs: report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Education of Handicapped Children and Young People (The Warnock Report). London: HMSO.
- DfE (Department for Education) (2011) Support and Aspiration: a new approach to special educational needs and disability – a consultation[online at http://media.education.gov.uk/assets/files/pdf/g/green%20paper%20presentation.pdf].
- DfES (Department for Education and Skills) (2007) The Early Years Foundation Stage[online at http://nationalstrategies.standards.dcsf.gov.uk/earlyyears].
-
Douglas, P. (2010) ‘ “Problematising” inclusion: education and the question of autism’, Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 18 (2), 105–121.
10.1080/14681366.2010.488039 Google Scholar
- Evans, P. & Varma, V. (1990) Special Education: past, present & future. Basingstoke: Falmer Press.
- Hodge, N. & Runswick-Cole, K. (under review) ‘ “They never pass me the ball”: exposing ableism through the leisure experiences of disabled children, young people and their families’, Children's Geographies .
- Goodley, D. (2011) Disability Studies: an interdisciplinary introduction. London: Sage.
- Goodley, D. & Runswick-Cole, K. (2010) ‘Emancipating play: dis/abled children, development and deconstruction’, Disability & Society, 25 (4), 499–512.
- Goodley, D. & Runswick-Cole, K. (forthcoming) ‘Decolonizing methodologies: disabled children as research managers and participant ethnographers’, in S. Grech and A. Azzopardi (eds) Communities: a reader. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
- Naylor, C. (2005) ‘Inclusion in British Columbia's public schools. Always a journey, never a destination?’ Paper presented at the Canadian Teachers' Federation conference, ‘Building Inclusive Schools: A Search for Solutions’, 17–19 November.
- S. J. Pijl, C. J. W. Meijer & S. Hegarty (eds) (1997) Inclusive Education: a global agenda. London: Routledge.
- Runswick-Cole, K. (2007) ‘Parents as advocates: the experiences of parents who register an appeal with the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal.’ Unpublished PhD thesis. Sheffield: Sheffield University.
-
Runswick-Cole, K. (2008) ‘Between a rock and a hard place: parents' attitudes to the inclusion of their children with special educational needs in mainstream schools’, British Journal of Special Education, 35 (3), 173–180.
10.1111/j.1467-8578.2008.00390.x Google Scholar
- Runswick-Cole, K. (forthcoming a) ‘Interviews’, in P. Bannister (ed.) Qualitative Methods in Psychology ( 3rd edition). Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Runswick-Cole, K. (forthcoming b) ‘Ethnography’, in P. Bannister (ed.) Qualitative Methods in Psychology ( 3rd edition). Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Slee, R. (1997) ‘Imported or important theory? Sociological interrogations of disablement and special education’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18 (3), 407–419.
- UN (United Nations) (2006) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations [online at http://www.un.org/disabilities].
- UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation) (1994) The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Educational Needs[online at http://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/SALAMA_E.PDF].
- UNICEF (United Nations Children's Fund) (1989) UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Geneva: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
- Walkerdine, V. (1993) ‘Beyond developmentalism’, Theory & Psychology, 3 (4), 451–469.
- Warnock, M. (2005) Special Education: a new look. London: Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain.