An investigation into the effectiveness of collaboration between Greek secondary EFL teachers and specialist providers for dyslexia issues
Abstract
This paper investigates the collaboration of Greek secondary school teachers of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) with psychologists and advisers for dyslexia issues. Data were collected through audio recorded observations and interviews with head teachers and teachers.
Taking a Vygotskian approach to learning, activity theory is applied to analyse the contradictions that emerge around the collaboration of teachers and head teachers with specialist provision for dyslexia issues from data in interviews and field notes across two schools. The analysis shows that contradictions are created when the participants try to achieve their goals for dyslexia support by the absence of ‘what’ artefacts – such as knowledge on dyslexia – and ‘how’ artefacts – processes and procedures such as collaboration with a counsellor – to support the collaboration of EFL teachers with EFL and special educational needs advisers and psychologists, the lack of staff at diagnostic centres and lack of funding for training. This finding indicates that the collaboration between psychologists, advisers and teachers to exchange information on pedagogy needs to be established through meetings and in-service training of teachers.
References
- Arapogianni, A. (2003) Investigating the Approaches that Teachers in Greece Use to Meet the Needs of Children with Dyslexia in Secondary Schools. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
-
Bedny, G. Z. &
Harris, S. R. (2005) ‘The systemic-structural theory of activity: applications to the study of human work.
Mind, Culture and Activity, 12 (2), pp. 128–47.
10.1207/s15327884mca1202_4 Google Scholar
- Bekos, I. (1997) Phonological Awareness and the Process of Learning to Read in Greek-English Bilingual Children. University of Birmingham.
- Brewer, J. D. (2000) Ethnography. Buckingham: Open University Press.
-
Cohen, L.,
Manion, L. &
Morrison, M. (2007) Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.
10.4324/9780203029053 Google Scholar
- Cole, M. (1996) Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Constantopoulou, X. (2002) Educational Policy and Practice for Dyslexic Pupils: The Greek Case. Athens, Greece: Educational Issues Publishers.
- Daniels, H. (2004) ‘Activity theory, discourse and Bernstein. Educational Review, 56 (2), pp. 121–32.
- Daniels, H., Leadbetter, J., Soares, A. & MacNab, N. (2007) ‘Learning in and for cross-school working. Oxford Review of Education, 33 (2), pp. 125–42.
- Denscombe, M. (2003) The Good Research Guide for Small-Scale Social Research Projects ( 2nd edn). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
- Donmoyer, R. (2000) ‘Generalizability and the single-case study.’ In R. Gomm, M. Hammersley & P. Foster (eds), Case Study Method: Key Issues, Key Texts, pp. 45–68. London: Sage.
-
Engeström, Y. (1999a) ‘Activity theory and individual and social transformation.’ In Y. Engeström,
R. Miettinen &
R. L. Punamaki (eds), Perspectives on Activity Theory, pp. 19–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511812774.003 Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y. (1999b) ‘Innovative learning in work teams: analysing cycles of knowledge creation in practice.’ In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen & R. L. Punamaki (eds), Perspectives on Activity Theory, pp. 377–404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Engeström, Y. (2001) ‘Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization.
Journal of Education and Work, 14 (1), pp. 133–56.
10.1080/13639080020028747 Google Scholar
-
Engeström, Y.,
Engeström, R. &
Karkkainen, M. (1995) ‘Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: learning and problem solving in complex work activities.
Learning and Instruction, 5 (4), p. 319–36.
10.1016/0959-4752(95)00021-6 Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. & Vahaaho, T. (1999) ‘When the centre does not hold: the importance of knotworking.’ In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard & U. Jensen (eds), Activity Theory and Social Practice, pp. 345–74. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
-
Fine, G. A. &
Shulman, D. (2009) ‘Lies from the field: ethical issues in organizational ethnography.’ In S. Ybema,
D. Yanow,
H. Wells &
F. Kamsteeg (eds), Organizational Ethnography: Studying the Complexities of Everyday Life, pp. 177–95. London: Sage.
10.4135/9781446278925.n10 Google Scholar
- Gavrilidou, M., De Mesquita, P. B. & Mason, E. J. (1994) ‘Greek teachers' perceptions of school psychologists in solving classroom problems. Journal of School Psychology, 32 (3), pp. 293–304.
- Glenny, G. & Roaf, C. (2008) Multiprofessional Communication: Making Systems Work for Children. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
- Goswami, U. (1997) ‘Learning to read in different orthographies: phonological awareness, orhtographic representations and dyslexia.’ In C. Hulme & M. Snowling (eds), Dyslexia: Biology, Cognition and Intervention, pp. 131–52. London: Whurr.
- Gutierrez, K. & Stone, L. (1997) ‘A cultural-historical view of learning and learning disabilities: participating in a community of learners. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 12 (2), pp. 113–31.
- Hunter-Carsch, M. (2001) ‘Learning support in the secondary school: needs analysis and provision for dyslexic pupils.’ In M. Hunter-Carsch & M. Herrington (eds), Dyslexia and Effective Learning in Secondary and Tertiary Education, pp. 12–37. London: Whurr Publishers.
-
Ifanti, A. (1995) ‘Policy making, politics and administration in education in Greece.
Educational Management and Administration, 23 (4), pp. 271–8.
10.1177/0263211X9502300407 Google Scholar
- Lacey, P. (2000) ‘Multidisciplinary work: challenges and possibilities.’ In H. Daniels (ed.), Special Education Re-Formed: Beyond Rhetoric, pp. 157–72. London: Falmer Press.
- Lacey, P. & Lomas, L. (1993) Support Services and the Curriculum: A Practical Guide to Collaboration. London: David Fulton.
- Lappas, N. (1997) Specific Learning Difficulties in Scotland and Greece: Perceptions and Provision. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Stirling, Stirling.
- Leadbetter, J. (2004) ‘The Role of mediating artefacts in the work of educational psychologists during consulative conversations in schools. Educational Review, 56 (2), pp. 133–45.
- Leont'ev, A. N. (1978) Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Leont'ev, A. N. (1981) Problems of the Development of the Mind. Moscow, Russia: Progress.
- Linder, T. (1990) Transdisciplinary Play-Based Assessment. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
- Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B. (2006) Designing Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
- Martin, D. (2008) ‘A new paradigm to inform inter-professional learning for integrating speech and language provision into secondary schools: a socio-cultural activity theory approach. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 24 (2), pp. 173–92.
- Miles, E. (2000) ‘Dyslexia may show a different face in different languages. Dyslexia, 6, pp. 193–201.
- Ministry of Education Lifelong Learning and Religious Affairs. Department of Secondary Education (2010) ‘Ministerial Decision 1-3-2010/23519/C2. Exams within schools (Final), written exams during the four months period of pupils with disability and special educational needs at technical vocational schools, vocational schools.
- Ministry of National Education and Religious Affairs (1983) ‘PD 340/83 Responsibilities of directors, directorates and offices.
- Ministry of National Education and Religious Affairs (1985). Government Gazette 167/30.9.85. Law 1566/85. ‘Structure and function of primary and secondary education.
- Ministry of National Education and Religious Affairs (2000) ‘FEK A′78/14.03.2000. Law 2817/2000. Education of people with special needs and other regulations. Chapter A. Education of people with special educational needs. Article 2.
- Ministry of National Education and Religious Affairs (2008). Law 3699/2008. ‘Special education of people with handicap or special educational needs.
- Ministry of National Education and Religious Affairs. Department of Secondary Education (2009) ‘Within schools exams, short time or hourly exams for trimester or four month periods of secondary school pupils with disability and special education needs or specific learning difficulties.
- Pigiaki, P. (1999) ‘The crippled “pedagogue”: discourses in education and the Greek case. Educational Review, 51 (1), pp. 55–65.
- Pollock, J. & Waller, E. (2003) Day-to-Day Dyslexia in the Classroom. London: Routledge.
- Protopapas, A. & Skaloumbakas, C. (2007) ‘Traditional and computer-based screening and diagnosis of reading disabilities in Greek. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40 (1), pp. 15–37.
- Robson, C. (2002) Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers ( 2nd edn). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Spencer, K. (2000) ‘Is English a dyslexic language?’ Dyslexia, 6, pp. 152–62.
-
Todd, L. (2007) Partnerships for Inclusive Education: A Critical Approach to Collaborative Working. London: Routledge.
10.4324/9780203967492 Google Scholar
-
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
10.1525/eth.1990.18.3.02a00020 Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1987) Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Ziegler, J. C., Conrad, P., Ma-Wyatt, A., Ladner, D. & Schulte-Korne, G. (2003) ‘Developmental dyslexia in different languages: language-specific or universal?’ Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86 (3), pp. 169–93.